Dentro Financial
  • About
  • Bookkeeping
  • Ventures
  • Wealth
  • Insights
  • Contact
  • Client Login
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
How Mental Distortions Impact Our Wallets

Written By: Dentro Financial

October 1, 2025

  • Share on Facebook
  • Square-x-twitter Square-x-twitter Share on X
  • Linkedin Linkedin Share on LinkedIn
  • Mail Mail Share by Mail

When it comes to our money, we like to think we’re making rational decisions. Yet, research in behavioural finance suggests that our emotions and personal beliefs play a far more significant role in our decision-making than we might think. Previously, we briefly examined how our emotions can influence our spending habits. Now, we will take a step back and discuss how personal beliefs and systematic errors in judgment can impact financial decisions. It may help you understand why trying to time the market is so challenging by examining the effects of these from the perspective of an active trader.

Cognitive Bias

  • Distortions in perception and judgement that are shaped by personal beliefs about oneself and the world

You can think of a cognitive bias as wearing rose-coloured glasses. Although you can see through them, they tint your view of the world. By drawing on your past experiences and aligning the current situation you are facing with your personal beliefs and experiences, your perceptions of yourself and the world around you are distorted. While these biases can assist in interpreting information, they can also lead to systematic errors in judgment. Much like emotions, cognitive biases can influence our behaviour unconsciously, making it essential to reflect on how they may impact our decisions.

Self-Serving Bias

  • The tendency to take credit for positive events or outcomes and deny responsibility for negative events or outcomes

Consider a time when you heard someone brag about a stock they bought that shot up in value. Did they give themselves a pat on the back and act like it was all because of their genius? Likely, a profitable investment was not entirely the result of their expert ability to analyze market trends but instead demonstrates the self-serving bias in action. The self-serving bias highlights the tendency for us to take credit for our successes but also blame our failures on others or circumstances beyond our control. For instance, consider a time when you heard someone talk about the stocks that did not perform well. Did they toss it up as a matter of bad luck?

The self-serving bias influences how we respond to gains and losses. When our investments yield high returns, we consider this evidence that we are intelligent investors, which increases our confidence in our investing skills and leads to more aggressive trading [1]. These tendencies are driven by the belief that we are intelligent and competent individuals who make good decisions—something we all want to believe is true. The self-serving bias supports our self-esteem by aligning our perception with a positive self-image. Whether we are conscious of it or not, this bias is something we all experience daily, and it produces clear and predictable patterns of human behaviour.

Overconfidence

  • Overestimating one’s abilities or knowledge

How funny do you think you are? Odds are, not as funny as you think. In one study, 80% of people claimed to have an above-average sense of humour, but this doesn’t make statistical sense [2]. After all, how could 80% of people be above average? The phenomenon is called overplacement, or the tendency to rate ourselves higher (or better) on some ability or characteristic than we are.

Overplacement has been observed in the general population across various traits, including intelligence, creativity, and driving ability, as well as among professionals in the financial sector. In 2013, one study found that CFOs consistently overestimated their ability to predict their firm’s financial performance [3]. Now, if they don’t even know what is going to happen, how would anyone else? Surprisingly, this confidence tends to increase in situations with greater levels of uncertainty. Investors often feel more confident, or even overconfident, when making judgments about stocks that are difficult to value [4].

Overconfidence, the tendency to overestimate our abilities, is another cognitive bias that has several known effects on investing behaviour. For one, overconfident investors are overly optimistic about their prospects, tend to invest more aggressively, and take on greater risks in more volatile markets, hoping to reap larger returns [5]. Overaggressive strategies, however, tend to result in financial losses. Investors also tend to be overconfident about information they receive concerning a stock’s price, interpreting their tips as more informative and reliable than they actually are [6]. These overreactions produce predictable patterns in stock prices, where further gains follow sudden price jumps in the short term, until the overreaction is corrected by losses in the long term [7]. Remember, there is no proven way to time the market.

The hard truth is that we see the world and ourselves the way we want to. We tend to seek out evidence that supports our positive self-image and disregard information that challenges it. These biases may not always lead to the most rational decisions, but they aren’t entirely harmful; they can help regulate emotions, boost confidence, fuel motivation, and shape the overall sense of self. Understanding how these biases can alter your thinking is a valuable skill —it gives you the clarity to make better choices, which you and your wallet will appreciate.

Glossary

Cognitive bias – distortions in perception and judgement that are shaped by personal beliefs about oneself and the world

Self-serving bias – the tendency to take credit for positive events or outcomes and deny responsibility for negative events or outcomes

Overconfidence bias – overestimating one’s abilities or knowledge

Endnotes

[1] Daniel K, Hirshleifer D, Subrahmanyam A. 1998. Investor psychology and security market under- and over-reactions. J. Finance 53:1839–86.

[2] Benoit JP, Dubra J, Moore DA. 2015. Does the better-than-average effect show that people are overconfident? Two experiments. J. Europ. Econ. Assoc. 13:293–329.

[3] Ben-David I, Graham JR, Harvey CR. 2013. Managerial miscalibration. Q. J. Econ. 128:1547–84.

[4] Odean T. 1998. Volume, volatility, price and profit when all traders are above average. J. Finance 53:1887–934.

[5] Odean T. 1998. Volume, volatility, price and profit when all traders are above average. J. Finance 53:1887–934.

[6] Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Behavioral finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), 133-159.

[7] Daniel K, Hirshleifer D, Subrahmanyam A. 1998. Investor psychology and security market under- and over-reactions. J. Finance 53:1839–86.

BUILD, PROTECT, MANAGE. LUXURY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS MADE FOR YOU.

© Copyright 2025 | Dentro Financial | Privacy | Terms of Use
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Instagram
Link to: The Emotional Side of Financial Decisions: The Hidden Forces That Trump Logic and Reason Link to: The Emotional Side of Financial Decisions: The Hidden Forces That Trump Logic and Reason The Emotional Side of Financial Decisions: The Hidden Forces That Trump Logic...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Read our Policy to learn more.

ACCEPT


How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Accept settingsHide notification only